History & Moving Forward: Public Engagement
Get involved. Stay involved.
Be part of the conversation!
The Potrero Canyon Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge project in the Pacific Palisades aims to develop a pedestrian and bike bridge to cross the Pacific Coast Highway and safely connect the City’s new George Wolfberg Park to Will Rogers Beach. Join the City of Los Angeles Bureau of Engineering, in collaboration with Councilmember Traci Park of District 11 for a virtual community meeting on Thursday, March 14 at 6:00 p.m. to help support the connectivity and accessibility of recreational areas while enhancing the quality of life for local residents and visitors.
The first meeting is March 14 at 6:00pm. Register here
for the meeting and to be added to their direct email list.
Any member of the public may sign up for notifications.
Help the City understand how the bridge will benefit you and your community by taking the Potrero Canyon Ped Bridge Survey!
We will post information about each meeting notification on this site, so please stay tuned.
Below, is a brief chronology with respect to how this bridge was originally conceived and the public process up to now.
Pre-1985: Landslides consume houses; city acquires properties
1985-91: The park is planned with a specific intention to bridge Pacific Palisades to the beach via Potrero Canyon Park - EIR and broad reporting.
1995-2004: Issues identified & moves for greater public engagement
Initially, it was thought the project would be completed by 1995. Elsewhere on this site we describe the multiagency issues and considerations for the overall park design, not the least of which is the park's extraordinary engineering and functionality as a riparian habitat.
Beginning in 2004, the new PCCAC engaged in a three-year effort to solicit community input. Dozens of meetings were held. Appointees to the PCCAC estimate that more than 1000 voices were heard. There was significant coverage of the proceedings by the media, most pointedly the community papers. The #1 recommendation of that committee was construction of a bridge across PCH. This recommendation was qualified only by a statement that “the Committee is not opposed to a further neutral assessment of the feasibility, safety and efficacy of an over- crossing as compared with other possible alternatives.”
2016-2022: Park Built - Where's Our Bridge?
2023 and Moving Forward!
If you have made it this far, we congratulate you on your fortitude. Since the bridge was funded, the matter of the bridge, whether there should be a bridge, whether there has been proper notice about the plan for a bridge, what the bridge's design and purpose should be, and commentary on whether the park should even exist has been discussed at great length for decades, in regularly noticed and special meetings of the Pacific Palisades Community Council (PPCC) since its 2004 vote to condition approval of the park project on construction of a bridge over PCH for beach access.
At its October 12, 2023 meeting, PPCC voted 13 to 3 to go forward with the Jacobs Engineering pre-design contract, which was approved the following day by LA City Public Works Department.
On December 5, 2023, City Councilmember Traci Park held a public forum on the bridge, which was widely publicized and attended. That forum again informed the community and heard all questions and points of both those concerned and those in support.
The first public outreach effort by Jacobs Engineering and the city will be on March 14, 2024, for an update on the pre-design contract's progress and to again hear comments from the community.
Recent discussions have included the city’s advice to the entire community that in the event of a wildfire, it would be best for some to "shelter in place”, whereas the Beach Access Bridge might serve the entire community as a safe pedestrian evacuation route (as access to the ocean recently saved a number of lives during the tragic fires in Maui).
The bridge was also the subject of a casual poll last year conducted by an online micro-publication focused on matters of interest in Pacific Palisades which concluded that the community had been heard from “loud and clear” in support of the bridge. There continue to be some voices opposing its construction; however, the very next steps now are another formalized round of public engagement for the -design- of the bridge. Its future as a safe and direct route to the beach, however, is no longer in question.